Maximize Sum Of Array After K Negations - Complete Solution Guide
Maximize Sum Of Array After K Negations is LeetCode problem 1005, a Easy level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.
Problem Statement
Given an integer array nums and an integer k , modify the array in the following way: choose an index i and replace nums[i] with -nums[i] . You should apply this process exactly k times. You may choose the same index i multiple times. Return the largest possible sum of the array after modifying it in this way . Example 1: Input: nums = [4,2,3], k = 1 Output: 5 Explanation: Choose index 1 and nums becomes [4,-2,3]. Example 2: Input: nums = [3,-1,0,2], k = 3 Output: 6 Explanation: Choose indices (
Detailed Explanation
This problem asks us to manipulate an array `nums` by repeatedly choosing an index `i` and replacing `nums[i]` with `-nums[i]`. We must perform this operation exactly `k` times, and we're allowed to pick the same index multiple times. Our goal is to find the largest possible sum of the array elements after all `k` negations are complete. The core challenge lies in strategically applying these `k` negations to maximize the final sum, especially considering the implications of choosing the same index more than once.
Solution Approach
The most intuitive way to maximize a sum is to make all numbers as positive as possible. Our solution employs a greedy strategy: first, we sort the `nums` array to easily identify the most negative numbers. We then iterate through the array, flipping every negative number to its positive counterpart using one of our `k` operations. This step always increases the total sum. If we exhaust `k` or run out of negative numbers, we proceed to the second phase. At this point, all numbers in the array are non-negative. If we still have `k` operations remaining, any further negation will convert a positive number to a negative one, thus *decreasing* the total sum. To minimize this decrease, we must target the number with the smallest absolute value. The crucial insight here is the parity of the remaining `k`: if `k` is even, we can perform `k/2` pairs of negations on the smallest number (e.g., `5 -> -5 -> 5`), effectively canceling out and causing no net change to the sum. If `k` is odd, we perform `(k-1)/2` such pairs, and then one final effective negation on the smallest number, turning it negative. Therefore, after flipping all initial negatives, we check if `k` is still positive and odd. If so, we re-sort the array (because the initial flips might have changed the relative order of numbers, e.g., -10 becoming 10 might be larger than 5, but after sorting, 5 would be `nums[0]`), then flip the smallest element (`nums[0]`) to its negative form. Finally, we sum the modified array.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
- Step 1: Sort the input array `nums` in ascending order. This allows efficient access to the smallest elements.
- Step 2: Iterate through the array. For each negative element encountered, negate it and decrement `k`. This step continues until either all negative numbers have been processed or `k` becomes 0.
- Step 3: If `k` is still greater than 0 after Step 2, it means we've negated all negative numbers. If `k` is odd, negating the smallest element (which is now non-negative) will increase the sum (or keep it the same if its 0).
- Step 4: Calculate the sum of the modified array and return the result.
Key Insights
- **Prioritize flipping negative numbers:** Maximizing the array sum fundamentally involves making numbers as large (positive) as possible. The most impactful way to achieve this is to convert existing negative values into their positive counterparts. Sorting the `nums` array allows us to systematically address the most negative numbers first, as these yield the largest absolute increase in sum when flipped.
- **Strategically minimize harm for leftover negations:** Once all numbers in the array are non-negative (or `k` operations run out before all negatives are flipped), any further negation will inevitably reduce the total sum. To maximize the final sum, we must strategically minimize this reduction by repeatedly targeting the number with the smallest absolute value. Flipping `1` to `-1` causes less sum reduction than flipping `100` to `-100`.
- **Leveraging `k`'s parity for 'undoing' flips:** The problem explicitly states we can choose the same index multiple times. This is critical: two negations on a number cancel each other out (e.g., `x -> -x -> x`). If, after handling all initial negative numbers, `k` operations are still remaining and `k` is *even*, we can pair up these negations on the current smallest absolute value number, resulting in no net change to the sum. Only if `k` is *odd* do we need to perform one final, effective flip on the smallest number, turning it negative to complete the `k` operations.
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity: O(nlogn)
Space Complexity: O(1)
Topics
This problem involves: Array, Greedy, Sorting.
Companies
Asked at: Druva.