Defanging an IP Address - Complete Solution Guide
Defanging an IP Address is LeetCode problem 1108, a Easy level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.
Problem Statement
Given a valid (IPv4) IP address , return a defanged version of that IP address. A defanged IP address replaces every period "." with "[.]" . Example 1: Input: address = "1.1.1.1" Output: "1[.]1[.]1[.]1" Example 2: Input: address = "255.100.50.0" Output: "255[.]100[.]50[.]0" Constraints: The given address is a valid IPv4 address.
Detailed Explanation
This problem asks us to take a given IPv4 address, provided as a string, and transform it into a 'defanged' version. The rule for defanging is quite specific: every period ('.') in the original address must be replaced with the sequence '[.]'. The problem statement explicitly guarantees that the input `address` will always be a valid IPv4 address, which is a helpful constraint – it means we don't need to write any validation logic for the IP format itself; we can simply focus on the string transformation. For instance, if we're given "1.1.1.1", the expected output is "1[.]1[.]1[.]1". Similarly, "255.100.50.0" should become "255[.]100[.]50[.]0". What makes this problem a good starting point for string manipulation is its clear, unambiguous requirement and the direct applicability of fundamental string operations. While seemingly trivial, correctly handling string transformations, especially when the replacement sequence differs in length from the target character, is a common task in parsing and data processing.
Solution Approach
The most straightforward and Pythonic (or idiomatic in many languages) approach for this problem is to leverage the built-in string `replace` method. This method is specifically designed to find all occurrences of a specified substring within a string and substitute them with another specified substring. In our case, we're replacing every instance of `.` with `[.]`. Most modern languages, including Python, Java, and C++, offer equivalent high-level string functions that abstract away the manual iteration and string building process. This approach works because string `replace` functions are typically optimized to handle such transformations efficiently. Instead of manually looping through the string, checking each character, and conditionally appending to a new string builder or list, we delegate this task to a highly tuned library function. This not only results in more concise and readable code but also generally performs better as these built-in methods are often implemented in lower-level languages (like C) and can manage memory allocations and character copying more effectively than a custom loop.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
- Step 1: Obtain the input IPv4 address string.
- Step 2: (Built-in function approach): Use the built-in string replace function to replace all occurrences of '.' with '[.]'.
- Step 3: (Manual approach): Iterate through the input string. If a character is '.', append "[.]" to the result; otherwise, append the character itself.
- Step 4: (Manual approach): Return the newly created defanged string. Remember to allocate sufficient memory for the result string (crucial in C).
Key Insights
- **Direct String Substitution with `replace`**: The most elegant and efficient way to solve this problem is to utilize the native `replace` function available in virtually all programming languages. This function directly addresses the problem's core requirement: finding all occurrences of a specific character ('.') and substituting them with a new string ('[.]').
- **Understanding String Immutability**: In many languages (like Python and Java), strings are immutable. The `replace` method does not modify the original `address` string in place; instead, it returns a *new* string containing the defanged result. This is a crucial concept to grasp for preventing unexpected behavior when working with string operations.
- **Leveraging Optimized Built-in Functions**: Relying on built-in string methods like `replace` is generally superior to manual iteration and string construction. These library functions are highly optimized for performance (often implemented in C or assembly), handling memory allocations and character manipulations much more efficiently than a custom, character-by-character loop, especially for larger strings.
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity: O(n)
Space Complexity: O(n)
Topics
This problem involves: String.
Companies
Asked at: Robinhood.