Advertisement

Minimum Time Visiting All Points - LeetCode 1266 Solution

Minimum Time Visiting All Points - Complete Solution Guide

Minimum Time Visiting All Points is LeetCode problem 1266, a Easy level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.

Problem Statement

On a 2D plane, there are n points with integer coordinates points[i] = [x i , y i ] . Return the minimum time in seconds to visit all the points in the order given by points . You can move according to these rules: In 1 second, you can either: move vertically by one unit, move horizontally by one unit, or move diagonally sqrt(2) units (in other words, move one unit vertically then one unit horizontally in 1 second). You have to visit the points in the same order as they appear in the array. You

Detailed Explanation

Imagine navigating a city grid where, in addition to moving straight along streets, you can also cut diagonally across blocks at the same speed. This problem asks for the minimum total time to visit a predefined sequence of points. You're given `n` points, and you *must* visit them in the exact order they appear in the input array. The crucial part is understanding the movement rules: moving one unit horizontally, one unit vertically, or one unit diagonally (meaning one unit horizontally *and* one unit vertically simultaneously) all take exactly 1 second. This simultaneous diagonal movement is what makes this problem distinct from a simple Manhattan distance calculation.

Solution Approach

The elegance of the solution lies in a crucial observation about the diagonal move. When traveling from `(x1, y1)` to `(x2, y2)`, let `dx = abs(x2 - x1)` and `dy = abs(y2 - y1)`. Each second, you can reduce `dx` by 1, or `dy` by 1, or both `dx` and `dy` by 1. To reach the target `(x2, y2)` in minimum time, you'll always want to leverage the diagonal move as much as possible, as it effectively reduces two 'distances' (X and Y) for the cost of one second. You can perform `min(dx, dy)` diagonal moves. Each of these moves reduces both `dx` and `dy` by one. After `min(dx, dy)` seconds, one of the differences (either `dx` or `dy`) will be zero, and the other will be `abs(dx - dy)`. The remaining `abs(dx - dy)` units of movement must then be covered purely horizontally or vertically, each taking 1 second per unit. Therefore, the total time for a single segment is `min(dx, dy) + abs(dx - dy)`, which mathematically simplifies directly to `max(dx, dy)`. The overall solution simply iterates through the given points, calculating this `max(dx, dy)` time for each consecutive pair and summing them up.

Step-by-Step Algorithm

  1. Step 1: Initialize a variable `totalTime` to 0. This variable will accumulate the total time taken to visit all points.
  2. Step 2: Iterate through the `points` array from the first point to the second to last point. For each point `i`, consider it along with the next point `i+1`.
  3. Step 3: Calculate the absolute difference in x-coordinates (`dx`) and the absolute difference in y-coordinates (`dy`) between points `i` and `i+1`.
  4. Step 4: Find the maximum of `dx` and `dy`. This represents the minimum time needed to travel from point `i` to point `i+1`.
  5. Step 5: Add this maximum value to `totalTime`.
  6. Step 6: After iterating through all consecutive pairs of points, return the final `totalTime`.

Key Insights

  • The diagonal movement rule is key: moving one unit in X and one unit in Y simultaneously still costs only 1 second. This isn't a Euclidean `sqrt(2)` movement in terms of time, but a combined Manhattan-like step.
  • Optimal path between two points: To minimize time between `(x1, y1)` and `(x2, y2)`, one should always maximize diagonal moves. You effectively make `min(abs(x2-x1), abs(y2-y1))` diagonal steps, and then `abs(abs(x2-x1) - abs(y2-y1))` straight (horizontal or vertical) steps. The sum of these two components `min(dx, dy) + abs(dx - dy)` directly equals `max(dx, dy)`.
  • The problem constraint to visit points 'in order' simplifies it significantly. We don't need to consider permutations or complex graph traversal algorithms like Traveling Salesperson. We just calculate the minimum time for each consecutive segment and add them up, leveraging the previously described optimal strategy for a single segment.

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity: O(n)

Space Complexity: O(1)

Topics

This problem involves: Array, Math, Geometry.

Companies

Asked at: Media.net.