Minimum Edge Reversals So Every Node Is Reachable - Complete Solution Guide
Minimum Edge Reversals So Every Node Is Reachable is LeetCode problem 2858, a Hard level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.
Problem Statement
There is a simple directed graph with n nodes labeled from 0 to n - 1 . The graph would form a tree if its edges were bi-directional. You are given an integer n and a 2D integer array edges , where edges[i] = [u i , v i ] represents a directed edge going from node u i to node v i . An edge reversal changes the direction of an edge, i.e., a directed edge going from node u i to node v i becomes a directed edge going from node v i to node u i . For every node i in the range [0, n - 1] , your task i
Detailed Explanation
The problem asks us to find the minimum number of edge reversals needed for each node in a directed graph (which would be a tree if the edges were undirected) such that it's possible to reach any other node starting from that node. For each node i, we need to find the minimum number of edge direction changes to make all other nodes reachable from i. The input is the number of nodes 'n' and a list of directed edges 'edges', where each edge is represented as [u, v] (from node u to node v). The output is an array 'answer' where answer[i] is the minimum number of reversals required for node i.
Solution Approach
The solution uses a two-pass approach. The first pass calculates the minimum edge reversals needed to reach all other nodes when node 0 is the root. This is done using a Breadth-First Search (BFS). During this BFS, we count how many edges point in the 'wrong' direction (v -> u instead of u -> v when exploring from node u). The second pass performs another BFS to 're-root' the tree. For each node, it utilizes the reversal count of its parent to determine its own reversal count. When moving from a parent node u to a child node v, we check the original edge direction. If the edge was u -> v, the reversal count for node v increases by 1 compared to node u because for node v, the edge direction is incorrect now. If the edge was v -> u, the reversal count for node v decreases by 1 compared to node u because the edge is now in the correct direction for node v.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
- Step 1: Create an adjacency list representation of the graph from the given edges. Store the original edges in a set for quick lookup.
- Step 2: Perform a BFS starting from node 0 to calculate the initial 'cost' (number of reversals) when node 0 is the root. Keep track of visited nodes to avoid cycles.
- Step 3: During the BFS from node 0, for each edge (u, v), check if the original edge was (v, u). If it was, increment the 'cost'.
- Step 4: Store the initial cost for node 0 in the 'answer' array: answer[0] = cost.
- Step 5: Perform a second BFS starting from node 0 to calculate the costs for all other nodes.
- Step 6: During the second BFS, for each edge (u, v), determine whether the edge was originally u -> v or v -> u.
- Step 7: If the original edge was u -> v, then answer[v] = answer[u] + 1 (one more reversal is needed for node v to reach all nodes).
- Step 8: If the original edge was v -> u, then answer[v] = answer[u] - 1 (one fewer reversal is needed for node v to reach all nodes).
- Step 9: Return the 'answer' array.
Key Insights
- Insight 1: The problem can be solved using a two-pass approach based on dynamic programming and graph traversal (BFS or DFS).
- Insight 2: The core idea is to first calculate the number of reversals needed for a specific root (node 0 in this case).
- Insight 3: Then, we can use this initial result to efficiently calculate the number of reversals needed for all other nodes by 're-rooting' the tree and updating the reversal count based on the direction of edges between parent and child nodes.
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity: O(n)
Space Complexity: O(n)
Topics
This problem involves: Dynamic Programming, Depth-First Search, Breadth-First Search, Graph.
Companies
Asked at: MathWorks.