Maximum Value of an Ordered Triplet II - Complete Solution Guide
Maximum Value of an Ordered Triplet II is LeetCode problem 2874, a Medium level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.
Problem Statement
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums . Return the maximum value over all triplets of indices (i, j, k) such that i < j < k . If all such triplets have a negative value, return 0 . The value of a triplet of indices (i, j, k) is equal to (nums[i] - nums[j]) * nums[k] . Example 1: Input: nums = [12,6,1,2,7] Output: 77 Explanation: The value of the triplet (0, 2, 4) is (nums[0] - nums[2]) * nums[4] = 77. It can be shown that there are no ordered triplets of indices with a value greater than
Detailed Explanation
The problem asks us to find the maximum value among all possible ordered triplets (i, j, k) in a given array `nums`, where i < j < k. The value of a triplet is calculated as (nums[i] - nums[j]) * nums[k]. If all possible triplets have a negative value, the function should return 0. The input is an array of integers, and the output is the maximum triplet value (or 0 if all are negative). The constraints specify that the array length is between 3 and 10^5, and the numbers in the array are between 1 and 10^6.
Solution Approach
The solution iterates through the `nums` array once. At each element `nums[k]`, it calculates the value of the triplet ending at `k` using previously computed `max_ij_diff`. The maximum result is updated accordingly. `max_i` keeps track of the maximum number encountered so far, and `max_ij_diff` maintains the maximum difference `nums[i] - nums[j]` encountered so far. This way, we only iterate once and only keep a few variables, resulting in a linear time solution.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
- Step 1: Initialize `res` to 0. This variable will store the maximum triplet value found so far.
- Step 2: Initialize `max_i` to 0. This variable will store the maximum value of `nums[i]` encountered so far.
- Step 3: Initialize `max_ij_diff` to 0. This variable will store the maximum value of `nums[i] - nums[j]` encountered so far.
- Step 4: Iterate through the `nums` array. In each iteration (let `num` be the current element):
- Step 5: Update `res` with the maximum of its current value and `max_ij_diff * num`. This represents the maximum triplet value seen so far with `num` being the last element of the triplet.
- Step 6: Update `max_ij_diff` with the maximum of its current value and `max_i - num`. This ensures we maintain the maximum possible difference between a previous element and the current element.
- Step 7: Update `max_i` with the maximum of its current value and `num`. This maintains the maximum element seen so far.
- Step 8: After iterating through the entire array, return `res`.
Key Insights
- Insight 1: The key to solving this problem efficiently is to realize that we don't need to generate all possible triplets explicitly. Instead, we can iterate through the array once, keeping track of the maximum value of `nums[i]` seen so far and the maximum value of `nums[i] - nums[j]` seen so far, where i < j.
- Insight 2: The problem can be solved with a single pass through the array, updating `max_i` and `max_ij_diff` dynamically. This avoids the O(n^3) complexity of brute-force triplet generation.
- Insight 3: Since the values in the array and intermediate results can be large, using `long long` (or `long` in Java) for calculations is crucial to prevent integer overflow. The result may be zero, which is handled appropriately.
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity: O(n)
Space Complexity: O(1)
Topics
This problem involves: Array.
Companies
Asked at: Media.net.