Advertisement

Divide an Array Into Subarrays With Minimum Cost I - LeetCode 3010 Solution

Divide an Array Into Subarrays With Minimum Cost I - Complete Solution Guide

Divide an Array Into Subarrays With Minimum Cost I is LeetCode problem 3010, a Easy level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.

Problem Statement

You are given an array of integers nums of length n . The cost of an array is the value of its first element. For example, the cost of [1,2,3] is 1 while the cost of [3,4,1] is 3 . You need to divide nums into 3 disjoint contiguous subarrays . Return the minimum possible sum of the cost of these subarrays . Example 1: Input: nums = [1,2,3,12] Output: 6 Explanation: The best possible way to form 3 subarrays is: [1], [2], and [3,12] at a total cost of 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. The other possible ways to form

Detailed Explanation

The problem asks you to divide an input array of integers into three disjoint, contiguous subarrays. The cost of each subarray is the value of its first element. The goal is to find the minimum possible sum of the costs of these three subarrays. The input is an array `nums` containing integers, and the output is a single integer representing the minimum total cost. Constraints limit the array size (3 to 50 elements) and the value range of elements (1 to 50).

Solution Approach

The provided code uses a brute-force approach. It iterates through all possible combinations of dividing the array into three subarrays. For each combination, it calculates the total cost (sum of the first elements of each subarray) and updates the minimum cost found so far. This approach works because it exhaustively checks all possibilities, guaranteeing the discovery of the minimum cost.

Step-by-Step Algorithm

  1. Step 1: Initialize `minCost` (or `ans`) to a very large value (infinity in Python, `Integer.MAX_VALUE` in Java, `INT_MAX` in C++). This variable will store the minimum cost found.
  2. Step 2: Iterate through all possible positions `i` for the end of the first subarray (from index 1 to `n-2`, where `n` is the array length).
  3. Step 3: For each `i`, iterate through all possible positions `j` for the end of the second subarray (from `i+1` to `n-1`).
  4. Step 4: Calculate the total cost as `nums[0] + nums[i] + nums[j]`. This represents the cost of the three subarrays: [nums[0]...nums[i-1]], [nums[i]...nums[j-1]], [nums[j]...nums[n-1]]
  5. Step 5: Update `minCost` if the current cost is less than the current minimum cost.
  6. Step 6: After iterating through all combinations, return `minCost`.

Key Insights

  • Insight 1: The cost of each subarray is determined solely by its first element. Therefore, we only need to consider the first element of each subarray when calculating the total cost.
  • Insight 2: A brute-force approach is feasible due to the small constraints on the input array size. We can iterate through all possible ways to divide the array into three subarrays and find the minimum cost.
  • Insight 3: The first element of the array is always part of the cost calculation, as it's always the first element of the first subarray. This simplifies the calculation.

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity: O(n^2)

Space Complexity: O(1)

Topics

This problem involves: Array, Sorting, Enumeration.

Companies

Asked at: American Express.