Advertisement

Find the Maximum Sum of Node Values - LeetCode 3068 Solution

Find the Maximum Sum of Node Values - Complete Solution Guide

Find the Maximum Sum of Node Values is LeetCode problem 3068, a Hard level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.

Problem Statement

There exists an undirected tree with n nodes numbered 0 to n - 1 . You are given a 0-indexed 2D integer array edges of length n - 1 , where edges[i] = [u i , v i ] indicates that there is an edge between nodes u i and v i in the tree. You are also given a positive integer k , and a 0-indexed array of non-negative integers nums of length n , where nums[i] represents the value of the node numbered i . Alice wants the sum of values of tree nodes to be maximum , for which Alice can perform the follo

Detailed Explanation

The problem describes a tree structure where each node has a value. We are given an array `nums` representing the values of the nodes, a value `k`, and an array `edges` representing the connections between nodes in the tree. The goal is to maximize the sum of the node values by performing XOR operations on connected nodes. Specifically, we can choose any edge (u, v) and perform `nums[u] = nums[u] XOR k` and `nums[v] = nums[v] XOR k`. We can perform this operation any number of times, including zero. The output is the maximum possible sum of the node values.

Solution Approach

The solution iterates through each node and determines whether XORing it with `k` would increase its value. It keeps track of the sum of the maximum values achievable for each node (either the original value or the XORed value). Also, it counts the number of nodes that are flipped and finds the minimum absolute difference between the original and flipped value for all nodes. Finally, if the number of flipped nodes is odd, the solution subtracts the minimum loss from the sum, as an odd number of flips means there's no way to 'cancel out' all XORs with another XOR, and the optimal action requires reducing overall sum by smallest value that was reduced by the XOR operation.

Step-by-Step Algorithm

  1. Step 1: Initialize `max_sum` to 0, `flipped_count` to 0, and `min_loss` to infinity.
  2. Step 2: Iterate through each node value `num` in `nums`.
  3. Step 3: Calculate `flipped_num = num XOR k`.
  4. Step 4: If `flipped_num > num`, add `flipped_num` to `max_sum` and increment `flipped_count`. Otherwise, add `num` to `max_sum`.
  5. Step 5: Calculate the absolute difference `loss = abs(num - flipped_num)` and update `min_loss = min(min_loss, loss)`.
  6. Step 6: After iterating through all nodes, check if `flipped_count` is even. If it is, return `max_sum`. Otherwise, return `max_sum - min_loss`.

Key Insights

  • Insight 1: The key insight is that performing the XOR operation twice on the same edge restores the original values. This means we only need to consider performing the operation zero or one time on each edge.
  • Insight 2: The parity (even or odd) of the number of nodes XORed with `k` matters. If an even number of nodes have been XORed, the total sum is not affected (as each XOR is paired up). If an odd number of nodes have been XORed with `k`, we should minimize the loss from the XOR operations by XORing the value that results in the least overall difference (absolute difference between the original value and the XORed value).
  • Insight 3: The tree structure itself doesn't fundamentally impact the approach other than the XOR operations apply between adjacent nodes. No tree traversal is required

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity: O(n)

Space Complexity: O(1)

Topics

This problem involves: Array, Dynamic Programming, Greedy, Bit Manipulation, Tree, Sorting.

Companies

Asked at: BlackRock, Deutsche Bank.