Advertisement

Increasing Triplet Subsequence - LeetCode 334 Solution

Increasing Triplet Subsequence - Complete Solution Guide

Increasing Triplet Subsequence is LeetCode problem 334, a Medium level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.

Problem Statement

Given an integer array nums , return true if there exists a triple of indices (i, j, k) such that i < j < k and nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k] . If no such indices exists, return false . Example 1: Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5] Output: true Explanation: Any triplet where i < j < k is valid. Example 2: Input: nums = [5,4,3,2,1] Output: false Explanation: No triplet exists. Example 3: Input: nums = [2,1,5,0,4,6] Output: true Explanation: One of the valid triplet is (3, 4, 5), because nums[3] == 0 < nums[

Detailed Explanation

The problem asks us to determine whether an integer array `nums` contains an increasing subsequence of length 3. More formally, we need to find indices `i`, `j`, and `k` such that `i < j < k` and `nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k]`. If such a subsequence exists, we return `true`; otherwise, we return `false`. The constraints indicate that the array's length can be up to 5 * 10^5, and the integer values are within the standard 32-bit range. The follow-up challenges us to solve this in O(n) time and O(1) space.

Solution Approach

The provided solution uses a greedy approach to efficiently determine the existence of an increasing triplet subsequence. It iterates through the array, maintaining two variables, `first` and `second`, representing the smallest and second smallest numbers encountered so far, respectively. For each number in the array, the algorithm compares it against `first` and `second`. If a number is smaller than or equal to `first`, we update `first`. If a number is greater than `first` but smaller than or equal to `second`, we update `second`. If a number is greater than both `first` and `second`, it means we've found an increasing triplet, and we return `true`. If the loop completes without finding such a triplet, we return `false`.

Step-by-Step Algorithm

  1. Step 1: Initialize `first` and `second` to positive infinity (or the maximum possible integer value in the given language).
  2. Step 2: Iterate through the `nums` array.
  3. Step 3: For each number `num` in `nums`:
  4. Step 4: If `num` is less than or equal to `first`, update `first` to `num`. This ensures `first` always holds the smallest value seen so far.
  5. Step 5: Else if `num` is less than or equal to `second`, update `second` to `num`. This means `num` is greater than `first` but not greater than `second`.
  6. Step 6: Else (if `num` is greater than both `first` and `second`), return `true`. This is because we have found a third number that is greater than both `first` and `second`, completing the increasing triplet.
  7. Step 7: If the loop completes without returning `true`, return `false`. This means no increasing triplet was found in the array.

Key Insights

  • Insight 1: We don't need to find the actual indices; we only need to determine if such a triplet exists.
  • Insight 2: Maintaining the smallest and second smallest values seen so far allows us to efficiently check if a larger value exists that completes the triplet.
  • Insight 3: The key to achieving O(1) space complexity is to avoid storing the entire subsequence; instead, keep track of the smallest two values seen so far.

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity: O(n)

Space Complexity: O(1)

Topics

This problem involves: Array, Greedy.

Companies

Asked at: Coupang, FactSet, IBM, MakeMyTrip, Nutanix.