House Robber III - Complete Solution Guide
House Robber III is LeetCode problem 337, a Medium level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.
Problem Statement
The thief has found himself a new place for his thievery again. There is only one entrance to this area, called root . Besides the root , each house has one and only one parent house. After a tour, the smart thief realized that all houses in this place form a binary tree. It will automatically contact the police if two directly-linked houses were broken into on the same night . Given the root of the binary tree, return the maximum amount of money the thief can rob without alerting the police . E
Detailed Explanation
The problem describes a scenario where a thief is attempting to rob houses arranged in a binary tree structure. Each house has a value representing the amount of money it contains. The constraint is that the thief cannot rob two directly connected houses (parent and child) without triggering an alarm. The task is to determine the maximum amount of money the thief can rob without alerting the police, given the root of the binary tree.
Solution Approach
The solution uses a recursive approach with memoization (implicitly through the return values of the recursive calls) to implement dynamic programming. For each node, the `_solve` function (or its equivalent in other languages) returns a tuple (or array) containing two values: the maximum amount of money that can be robbed including the current node, and the maximum amount of money that can be robbed excluding the current node. The `rob` function calls `_solve` on the root and returns the maximum of the two values returned by `_solve`.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
- Step 1: Define a recursive helper function `_solve` (or equivalent) that takes a node as input and returns a tuple (or array) of two integers: `(rob_this, not_rob_this)`. `rob_this` represents the maximum amount that can be robbed if we rob the current node, and `not_rob_this` represents the maximum amount that can be robbed if we don't rob the current node.
- Step 2: Base case: If the node is null, return (0, 0), meaning we can rob nothing in either case.
- Step 3: Recursively call `_solve` on the left and right children of the current node to get the results for the left and right subtrees: `left_rob, left_not_rob` and `right_rob, right_not_rob`.
- Step 4: Calculate `rob_this`: If we rob the current node, we cannot rob its children. Therefore, `rob_this = node.val + left_not_rob + right_not_rob`.
- Step 5: Calculate `not_rob_this`: If we don't rob the current node, we can either rob or not rob its children. Therefore, `not_rob_this = max(left_rob, left_not_rob) + max(right_rob, right_not_rob)`.
- Step 6: Return the tuple `(rob_this, not_rob_this)`.
- Step 7: In the `rob` function, call `_solve` on the root and return `max(rob_this, not_rob_this)`.
Key Insights
- Insight 1: The problem can be solved using dynamic programming on a tree. At each node, we have two choices: rob the current house or don't rob it.
- Insight 2: The recursive structure of the binary tree lends itself well to a recursive solution that utilizes overlapping subproblems, making dynamic programming an ideal approach.
- Insight 3: We need to maintain two values for each node: the maximum amount we can rob if we rob the current node, and the maximum amount we can rob if we don't rob the current node.
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity: O(n)
Space Complexity: O(n)
Topics
This problem involves: Dynamic Programming, Tree, Depth-First Search, Binary Tree.
Companies
Asked at: PhonePe, oyo.