Advertisement

K-Similar Strings - LeetCode 854 Solution

K-Similar Strings - Complete Solution Guide

K-Similar Strings is LeetCode problem 854, a Hard level challenge. This complete guide provides step-by-step explanations, multiple solution approaches, and optimized code in python3, java, cpp, c.

Problem Statement

Strings s1 and s2 are k -similar (for some non-negative integer k ) if we can swap the positions of two letters in s1 exactly k times so that the resulting string equals s2 . Given two anagrams s1 and s2 , return the smallest k for which s1 and s2 are k -similar . Example 1: Input: s1 = "ab", s2 = "ba" Output: 1 Explanation: The two string are 1-similar because we can use one swap to change s1 to s2: "ab" --> "ba". Example 2: Input: s1 = "abc", s2 = "bca" Output: 2 Explanation: The two strings a

Detailed Explanation

The problem asks to find the minimum number of swaps required to transform string `s1` into string `s2`, where `s1` and `s2` are anagrams of each other. A swap involves exchanging the positions of two characters in `s1`. The goal is to find the 'k' value, where `s1` and `s2` are considered k-similar.

Solution Approach

The solution uses Breadth-First Search (BFS) to explore the possible swap combinations and find the minimum number of swaps needed to transform `s1` into `s2`. The algorithm maintains a queue of states to explore, where each state is a pair of the current string and the number of swaps performed so far. A visited set is used to avoid revisiting states.

Step-by-Step Algorithm

  1. Step 1: Preprocess the strings: Create filtered versions of `s1` and `s2` containing only the characters that are at different positions between the two original strings. This reduces the search space.
  2. Step 2: Initialize BFS: Create a queue and add the initial state (filtered `s1` and swap count 0). Also, create a set to keep track of visited states to prevent cycles.
  3. Step 3: Iterate using BFS: While the queue is not empty, dequeue a state (current string and swap count).
  4. Step 4: Check for the goal state: If the current string is equal to the filtered `s2`, return the swap count (k).
  5. Step 5: Find the first mismatched character: Iterate through the current string to find the index `i` of the first character that is different from the character at the same index in filtered `s2`.
  6. Step 6: Explore possible swaps: Iterate through the remaining characters of the current string (starting from `i+1`). If a character at index `j` is equal to the character at index `i` in the target string `s2`, perform a swap between indices `i` and `j`.
  7. Step 7: Add the new state to the queue: If the new string generated from the swap has not been visited before, add it to the queue with an incremented swap count. Mark the new string as visited.
  8. Step 8: Backtrack (undo the swap): After exploring the swap, revert it back to the original state to explore other possible swaps. This ensures all possible swaps are considered.
  9. Step 9: If the queue becomes empty and the target string is not found, it means that it is not reachable. Return -1 in this case although since the input strings are anagrams this case cannot happen.

Key Insights

  • Insight 1: The problem can be modeled as a graph search where each state is a possible string that can be obtained from `s1` through swaps. The goal is to find the shortest path from `s1` to `s2`.
  • Insight 2: Breadth-First Search (BFS) is suitable for finding the shortest path in an unweighted graph, making it an ideal algorithm for this problem.
  • Insight 3: To optimize, only consider swapping characters that are not in their correct positions. Pre-filtering these positions simplifies the search space and reduces the number of unnecessary operations.

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity: O(n^2 * 2^n)

Space Complexity: O(2^n)

Topics

This problem involves: Hash Table, String, Breadth-First Search.

Companies

Asked at: DoorDash.